Piano.cat
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Principal
    2. Uncategorized
    3. If you're talking to EU politicians about tech sovereignty, there are a couple of things I hope you'll ask them to consider:
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz

      If you're talking to EU politicians about tech sovereignty, there are a couple of things I hope you'll ask them to consider:

      ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz

      @david_chisnall So much agreed. I would star and boost this multiple times if possible.

      Unfortunately we live in a system where building sustainably like this is disinsentivised, but still, here's to hoping.

        0
        Offline ananas@scicomm.xyz •
        , last edited by
      • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
        david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

        @ananas

        Here is the one-sentence summary for politicians:

        Do you want to create an environment where corporations are more powerful than parliaments?

        Hopefully that's enough to get their self interest on side.

          0
          Offline david_chisnall@infosec.exchange •
          , last edited by
        • ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz
          ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz

          @david_chisnall I am unfortunately not at all certain that our current government in Finland would answer that with a "no".

            0
            Offline ananas@scicomm.xyz •
            , last edited by
          • ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz
            ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz

            @the_decryptor @david_chisnall

            Unfortunately, that job might also be both more profitable and more secure than waiting for the next elections.

              0
              Offline ananas@scicomm.xyz •
              , last edited by
            • 12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6@mostr.pub1 12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6@mostr.pub
              12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6@mostr.pub1 12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6@mostr.pub
              Thanks for writing this. You're right

              With Nostr being a protocol, as opposed to an single open source project, then I think it might fit in nicely there. The EU could encourage development of many Nostr projects without the 'centralization' risk that you mention

              But I guess I'm naive, and I shouldn't obsess about Nostr 😀

              (I tried to zap you, but you don't see to have an address set up)
                0
                Offline 12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6@mostr.pub •
                , last edited by
              • cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net
                cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net

                @david_chisnall multiple great threads happening on this very topic, just sad it's taken so long for people to start thinking critically about it.

                Christine Lemmer-Webber (@cwebber@social.coop)

                This blogpost makes an astoundingly good case about LLMs I hadn't considered before. The collapse of public forums (like Stack Overflow) for programming answers coincides directly with the rise of programmers asking for answers from chatbots *directly*. Those debugging sessions become part of a training set that now *only private LLM corporations have access to*. This is something that "open models" seemingly can't easily fight. https://michiel.buddingh.eu/enclosure-feedback-loop

                favicon

                social.coop (social.coop)

                  0
                  Offline cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net •
                  , last edited by
                • ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu
                  ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu

                  @david_chisnall I would also like to add that besides less pressure, the smaller companies will also often have conflicting interests, making the political pressure balance out more as well.

                    0
                    Offline ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu •
                    , last edited by
                  • riley@toot.catR riley@toot.cat
                    riley@toot.catR riley@toot.cat

                    @david_chisnall Well, an important factor behind this is the Reagan-era deregulation of conglomerates. EU has a more functional competition regulation system, so the forces here likely do not automatically favour the development of such huge black tech-holes.

                    But it's an important concern to keep one's mind on when one's dabbling in regulatory affairs.

                      0
                      Offline riley@toot.cat •
                      , last edited by
                    • uis@pone.socialU uis@pone.social
                      uis@pone.socialU uis@pone.social

                      @david_chisnall there is another part to it, that current laws ban attempts at enforcing regulation or even common sense by individuals. Take Article 6 of Copyright Directive in EU or DMCA 1201 in USSA, that demands government to send you in prison for sensible things like refilling ink cartridge or playing with your friends a game, that publisher(remember, publishers are not developers) decided to be unplayable.

                        0
                        Offline uis@pone.social •
                        , last edited by
                      • jonoleth@mastodon.socialJ jonoleth@mastodon.social
                        jonoleth@mastodon.socialJ jonoleth@mastodon.social

                        @ananas @david_chisnall Swedish Moderaterna would be throwing money at you before you even finished the question

                          0
                          Offline jonoleth@mastodon.social •
                          , last edited by
                        • humanhorseshoes@mastodon.worldH humanhorseshoes@mastodon.world
                          humanhorseshoes@mastodon.worldH humanhorseshoes@mastodon.world

                          @david_chisnall These US tech companies are regulated by the weakest of the weak Irish regulators in Ireland. The pressure needs to be put on Ireland and not screamed into the void

                            0
                            Offline humanhorseshoes@mastodon.world •
                            , last edited by
                          • emmecola@mastodon.unoE emmecola@mastodon.uno
                            emmecola@mastodon.unoE emmecola@mastodon.uno

                            @david_chisnall I agree. The important thing that authorities should promote is not company size but common standards, so that many different services offered by many companies remain interoperable

                              0
                              Offline emmecola@mastodon.uno •
                              , last edited by
                            • njyo@mastodon.socialN njyo@mastodon.social
                              njyo@mastodon.socialN njyo@mastodon.social

                              In essence it goes back to #OpenStandards and #Interoperability.

                              @david_chisnall

                                0
                                Offline njyo@mastodon.social •
                                , last edited by
                              • theonedoc@tech.lgbtT theonedoc@tech.lgbt
                                theonedoc@tech.lgbtT theonedoc@tech.lgbt

                                @david_chisnall ... but not for there owner class and we all only exist so the owner class can burn the planet and hoard everything...

                                  0
                                  Offline theonedoc@tech.lgbt •
                                  , last edited by
                                • klepsis@indieauthors.socialK klepsis@indieauthors.social
                                  klepsis@indieauthors.socialK klepsis@indieauthors.social

                                  @david_chisnall this is just the old conflict between efficiency and robustness played out in a new arena (not that new, TBH). The usual pattern is everyone goes for the efficiency until the failure mode hits them, then they overcorrect on robustness.

                                    0
                                    Offline klepsis@indieauthors.social •
                                    , last edited by
                                  • aerique@genart.socialA aerique@genart.social
                                    aerique@genart.socialA aerique@genart.social

                                    @cmthiede @david_chisnall Well, for *certain* people to start thinking critically about it while ignoring other people's warnings for years.

                                      0
                                      Offline aerique@genart.social •
                                      , last edited by
                                    • cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net
                                      cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net

                                      @aerique @david_chisnall IKR, been talking to the walls since 2004, just never "vibed" right with people. It's not exactly something one would WANT to ever "trend" in the 1st place, but here we are, atop the precipice.

                                        0
                                        Offline cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net •
                                        , last edited by
                                      • normandunbar@mastodon.scotN normandunbar@mastodon.scot
                                        normandunbar@mastodon.scotN normandunbar@mastodon.scot

                                        @the_decryptor @david_chisnall @ananas That's what we (UK) got from Thatcher back when. It has failed to provide other than dividends for shareholders.

                                          0
                                          Offline normandunbar@mastodon.scot •
                                          , last edited by
                                        • kitten_tech@fosstodon.orgK kitten_tech@fosstodon.org
                                          kitten_tech@fosstodon.orgK kitten_tech@fosstodon.org

                                          @david_chisnall and the presence of these projects that need massive teams to support is a huge red flag that there's deeper problems in the software ecosystem... If we can fight the unnecessary complexity underlying those, it'll help, but that's a longer gamr

                                            0
                                            Offline kitten_tech@fosstodon.org •
                                            , last edited by
                                          Loading More Posts
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • First post
                                            Last post