Piano.cat
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Principal
    2. Uncategorized
    3. If you're talking to EU politicians about tech sovereignty, there are a couple of things I hope you'll ask them to consider:
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • eloy@hsnl.socialE eloy@hsnl.social

      If you're talking to EU politicians about tech sovereignty, there are a couple of things I hope you'll ask them to consider:

      eloy@hsnl.socialE eloy@hsnl.social

      @david_chisnall "too big to fork", I love this expression

        0
        Offline eloy@hsnl.social •
        , last edited by
      • szescstopni@circumstances.runS szescstopni@circumstances.run
        szescstopni@circumstances.runS szescstopni@circumstances.run

        @david_chisnall Why build thousands of warships for our navy when we can have one big beautiful warship the size of a thousand warships.

          0
          Offline szescstopni@circumstances.run •
          , last edited by
        • lbruno@miserables.netL lbruno@miserables.net
          lbruno@miserables.netL lbruno@miserables.net

          @eloy @david_chisnall

          there's a certain parallel w/ the “too big to bail” problem we had break in 2008 when the banks were small-N multiples of GDP and hence couldn't have been bailed out without printing Euros and Germany said `nein`

          if too big to fork happens, it deffn will happen in Europe, for the irony if for no other reason

            0
            Offline lbruno@miserables.net •
            , last edited by
          • ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz
            ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz

            @david_chisnall So much agreed. I would star and boost this multiple times if possible.

            Unfortunately we live in a system where building sustainably like this is disinsentivised, but still, here's to hoping.

              0
              Offline ananas@scicomm.xyz •
              , last edited by
            • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
              david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

              @ananas

              Here is the one-sentence summary for politicians:

              Do you want to create an environment where corporations are more powerful than parliaments?

              Hopefully that's enough to get their self interest on side.

                0
                Offline david_chisnall@infosec.exchange •
                , last edited by
              • ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz
                ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz

                @david_chisnall I am unfortunately not at all certain that our current government in Finland would answer that with a "no".

                  0
                  Offline ananas@scicomm.xyz •
                  , last edited by
                • ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz
                  ananas@scicomm.xyzA ananas@scicomm.xyz

                  @the_decryptor @david_chisnall

                  Unfortunately, that job might also be both more profitable and more secure than waiting for the next elections.

                    0
                    Offline ananas@scicomm.xyz •
                    , last edited by
                  • 12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6@mostr.pub1 12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6@mostr.pub
                    12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6@mostr.pub1 12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6@mostr.pub
                    Thanks for writing this. You're right

                    With Nostr being a protocol, as opposed to an single open source project, then I think it might fit in nicely there. The EU could encourage development of many Nostr projects without the 'centralization' risk that you mention

                    But I guess I'm naive, and I shouldn't obsess about Nostr 😀

                    (I tried to zap you, but you don't see to have an address set up)
                      0
                      Offline 12ee03d11684a125dd87be879c28190415be3f3b1eca6b4ed743bd74ffd880e6@mostr.pub •
                      , last edited by
                    • cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net
                      cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net

                      @david_chisnall multiple great threads happening on this very topic, just sad it's taken so long for people to start thinking critically about it.

                      Christine Lemmer-Webber (@cwebber@social.coop)

                      This blogpost makes an astoundingly good case about LLMs I hadn't considered before. The collapse of public forums (like Stack Overflow) for programming answers coincides directly with the rise of programmers asking for answers from chatbots *directly*. Those debugging sessions become part of a training set that now *only private LLM corporations have access to*. This is something that "open models" seemingly can't easily fight. https://michiel.buddingh.eu/enclosure-feedback-loop

                      favicon

                      social.coop (social.coop)

                        0
                        Offline cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net •
                        , last edited by
                      • ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu
                        ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu

                        @david_chisnall I would also like to add that besides less pressure, the smaller companies will also often have conflicting interests, making the political pressure balance out more as well.

                          0
                          Offline ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu •
                          , last edited by
                        • riley@toot.catR riley@toot.cat
                          riley@toot.catR riley@toot.cat

                          @david_chisnall Well, an important factor behind this is the Reagan-era deregulation of conglomerates. EU has a more functional competition regulation system, so the forces here likely do not automatically favour the development of such huge black tech-holes.

                          But it's an important concern to keep one's mind on when one's dabbling in regulatory affairs.

                            0
                            Offline riley@toot.cat •
                            , last edited by
                          • uis@pone.socialU uis@pone.social
                            uis@pone.socialU uis@pone.social

                            @david_chisnall there is another part to it, that current laws ban attempts at enforcing regulation or even common sense by individuals. Take Article 6 of Copyright Directive in EU or DMCA 1201 in USSA, that demands government to send you in prison for sensible things like refilling ink cartridge or playing with your friends a game, that publisher(remember, publishers are not developers) decided to be unplayable.

                              0
                              Offline uis@pone.social •
                              , last edited by
                            • jonoleth@mastodon.socialJ jonoleth@mastodon.social
                              jonoleth@mastodon.socialJ jonoleth@mastodon.social

                              @ananas @david_chisnall Swedish Moderaterna would be throwing money at you before you even finished the question

                                0
                                Offline jonoleth@mastodon.social •
                                , last edited by
                              • humanhorseshoes@mastodon.worldH humanhorseshoes@mastodon.world
                                humanhorseshoes@mastodon.worldH humanhorseshoes@mastodon.world

                                @david_chisnall These US tech companies are regulated by the weakest of the weak Irish regulators in Ireland. The pressure needs to be put on Ireland and not screamed into the void

                                  0
                                  Offline humanhorseshoes@mastodon.world •
                                  , last edited by
                                • emmecola@mastodon.unoE emmecola@mastodon.uno
                                  emmecola@mastodon.unoE emmecola@mastodon.uno

                                  @david_chisnall I agree. The important thing that authorities should promote is not company size but common standards, so that many different services offered by many companies remain interoperable

                                    0
                                    Offline emmecola@mastodon.uno •
                                    , last edited by
                                  • njyo@mastodon.socialN njyo@mastodon.social
                                    njyo@mastodon.socialN njyo@mastodon.social

                                    In essence it goes back to #OpenStandards and #Interoperability.

                                    @david_chisnall

                                      0
                                      Offline njyo@mastodon.social •
                                      , last edited by
                                    • theonedoc@tech.lgbtT theonedoc@tech.lgbt
                                      theonedoc@tech.lgbtT theonedoc@tech.lgbt

                                      @david_chisnall ... but not for there owner class and we all only exist so the owner class can burn the planet and hoard everything...

                                        0
                                        Offline theonedoc@tech.lgbt •
                                        , last edited by
                                      • klepsis@indieauthors.socialK klepsis@indieauthors.social
                                        klepsis@indieauthors.socialK klepsis@indieauthors.social

                                        @david_chisnall this is just the old conflict between efficiency and robustness played out in a new arena (not that new, TBH). The usual pattern is everyone goes for the efficiency until the failure mode hits them, then they overcorrect on robustness.

                                          0
                                          Offline klepsis@indieauthors.social •
                                          , last edited by
                                        • aerique@genart.socialA aerique@genart.social
                                          aerique@genart.socialA aerique@genart.social

                                          @cmthiede @david_chisnall Well, for *certain* people to start thinking critically about it while ignoring other people's warnings for years.

                                            0
                                            Offline aerique@genart.social •
                                            , last edited by
                                          • cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net
                                            cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net

                                            @aerique @david_chisnall IKR, been talking to the walls since 2004, just never "vibed" right with people. It's not exactly something one would WANT to ever "trend" in the 1st place, but here we are, atop the precipice.

                                              0
                                              Offline cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net •
                                              , last edited by
                                            Loading More Posts
                                            • Oldest to Newest
                                            • Newest to Oldest
                                            • Most Votes
                                            Reply
                                            • Reply as topic
                                            Log in to reply
                                            • First post
                                              Last post