Piano.cat
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Principal
    2. Uncategorized
    3. One for #mastoadmin - I have reason to believe the UK government may ban Twitter within a week or two, so you may see an influx of users.
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • donhawkins@mastodon.socialD donhawkins@mastodon.social

      One for #mastoadmin - I have reason to believe the UK government may ban Twitter within a week or two, so you may see an influx of users.

      donhawkins@mastodon.socialD donhawkins@mastodon.social

      @GossiTheDog “The Britsh Are Coming”!!! 😎

        0
        Offline donhawkins@mastodon.social •
        , last edited by
      • dziadekmick@mstdn.socialD dziadekmick@mstdn.social
        dziadekmick@mstdn.socialD dziadekmick@mstdn.social

        @GossiTheDog
        When I see "reason to believe" I reach for my shotgun.

          0
          Offline dziadekmick@mstdn.social •
          , last edited by
        • Q quanin@allovertheplace.ca
          Q quanin@allovertheplace.ca

          @GossiTheDog Every country should move toward banning Twitter given its recent and intentional CSAM problem. Good on the UK for possibly being the first. As for your Mastodon instance, open registrations without approval should be discouraged anyway. That's the only antispam measure we've got.

            0
            Offline quanin@allovertheplace.ca •
            , last edited by
          • carpetbomberz@mastodon.onlineC carpetbomberz@mastodon.online
            carpetbomberz@mastodon.onlineC carpetbomberz@mastodon.online

            @GossiTheDog

            Link Preview Image
              0
              Offline carpetbomberz@mastodon.online •
              , last edited by
            • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social
              gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

              @quanin it’s not the only anti spam measure on my instance.

                0
                Offline gossithedog@cyberplace.social •
                , last edited by
              • Q quanin@allovertheplace.ca
                Q quanin@allovertheplace.ca

                @GossiTheDog It helps, though. Out of curiosity, what else are you using? I don't have that problem yet but it's a federated instance so I probably will.

                  0
                  Offline quanin@allovertheplace.ca •
                  , last edited by
                • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social
                  gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                  @quanin the built in Captcha support filters almost all of it, I also manually review new users and IP block problematic subnets.

                  My server has been up for 3 years as open registration the whole time, on the Join Mastodon server list too, and there’s never been a spam problem.

                    0
                    Offline gossithedog@cyberplace.social •
                    , last edited by
                  • Q quanin@allovertheplace.ca
                    Q quanin@allovertheplace.ca

                    @GossiTheDog HCaptcha is Mastodon's only CAPTCHA option, and that poses accessibility concerns. You may be inadvertently preventing users with some disabilities from signing up on your instance before they reach the pending approval stage.

                    Some starter reading: https://fireborn.mataroa.blog/blog/hellcaptcha-accessibility-theater-at-its-worst/

                      0
                      Offline quanin@allovertheplace.ca •
                      , last edited by
                    • wiredfire@mstdn.socialW wiredfire@mstdn.social
                      wiredfire@mstdn.socialW wiredfire@mstdn.social

                      @bit @implementcontrols @GossiTheDog but mY fReE sPeAcH

                        0
                        Offline wiredfire@mstdn.social •
                        , last edited by
                      • wiredfire@mstdn.socialW wiredfire@mstdn.social
                        wiredfire@mstdn.socialW wiredfire@mstdn.social

                        @davey_cakes @jpages @GossiTheDog yeah, basically inherited the same rules as the EU after Brexit.

                          0
                          Offline wiredfire@mstdn.social •
                          , last edited by
                        • quasit@kolektiva.socialQ quasit@kolektiva.social
                          quasit@kolektiva.socialQ quasit@kolektiva.social

                          @GossiTheDog What about age verification? Isn't that required now? I thought Mastodon either couldn't or wouldn't age verify.

                            0
                            Offline quasit@kolektiva.social •
                            , last edited by
                          • fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF fluffykittycat@furry.engineer
                            fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF fluffykittycat@furry.engineer

                            @mkj @joannaholman @0xabad1dea @GossiTheDog learning how to absorb inflex of people from decaying corporate nonsense is something we're going to have to get good at, and it has both Technical and social aspects

                              0
                              Offline fluffykittycat@furry.engineer •
                              , last edited by
                            • fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF fluffykittycat@furry.engineer
                              fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF fluffykittycat@furry.engineer

                              @jsbarretto @Umiamz @GossiTheDog if they don't, it will completely destroy m the Online safety act, which would be a good thing under any other circumstance but mixed in this case. The worst case is that the rich and Powerful are allowed to do whatever whereas People Like Us would be aggressively hunted under the law so we have to avoid that outcome

                                0
                                Offline fluffykittycat@furry.engineer •
                                , last edited by
                              • octaviaconamore@cutie.cityO octaviaconamore@cutie.city
                                octaviaconamore@cutie.cityO octaviaconamore@cutie.city

                                @growfediverse @fluffykittycat @GossiTheDog honestly, the thing I've seen he most is decision paralysis if we can get someone on Fedi anywhere, that's 90% of the battle and they can slowly learn from there at their own pace

                                  0
                                  Offline octaviaconamore@cutie.city •
                                  , last edited by
                                • gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social
                                  gossithedog@cyberplace.socialG gossithedog@cyberplace.social

                                  @quanin I know.

                                    0
                                    Offline gossithedog@cyberplace.social •
                                    , last edited by
                                  • jsbarretto@social.coopJ jsbarretto@social.coop
                                    jsbarretto@social.coopJ jsbarretto@social.coop

                                    @fluffykittycat @Umiamz @GossiTheDog Yeah. If you're gonna pass such a rubbish piece of legislation, at least make use of it, right?

                                      0
                                      Offline jsbarretto@social.coop •
                                      , last edited by
                                    • fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF fluffykittycat@furry.engineer
                                      fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF fluffykittycat@furry.engineer

                                      @OctaviaConAmore @growfediverse @GossiTheDog we should recommend people specific communities, strong enough to stand on their own, with federation as an additional benefit

                                        0
                                        Offline fluffykittycat@furry.engineer •
                                        , last edited by
                                      • fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF fluffykittycat@furry.engineer
                                        fluffykittycat@furry.engineerF fluffykittycat@furry.engineer

                                        @jsbarretto @Umiamz @GossiTheDog because it was never about protecting children. It never is. It's a homophobic pro genocide law and if X isn't delt with we will know that beyond a shadow of a doubt

                                          0
                                          Offline fluffykittycat@furry.engineer •
                                          , last edited by
                                        • octaviaconamore@cutie.cityO octaviaconamore@cutie.city
                                          octaviaconamore@cutie.cityO octaviaconamore@cutie.city

                                          @fluffykittycat @growfediverse @GossiTheDog ideally, yes, but a lot of people nowadays want to be where everyone is, so the direction sorry of end up flipped from what you described: of we can get them to try fedi, they may find a community they feel comfortable in which they can eventually move closer to

                                          I wish it wasn't that way, but I think we have to meet people where they are in a lot of ways

                                            0
                                            Offline octaviaconamore@cutie.city •
                                            , last edited by
                                          • zolt4r_teh_gr8@infosec.exchangeZ zolt4r_teh_gr8@infosec.exchange
                                            zolt4r_teh_gr8@infosec.exchangeZ zolt4r_teh_gr8@infosec.exchange

                                            @GossiTheDog

                                            The boomers used the "Ban hammer" hard on Gen-X fun, do we not remember how that turned out?

                                            Instead of banning stuff, why don't they just remove the Anti circumvention law that the US shoved down the throats of all its trading partners under threat of tariffs in order to keep US big tech monopoly? I mean, we already got the tariffs 😅

                                              0
                                              Offline zolt4r_teh_gr8@infosec.exchange •
                                              , last edited by
                                            Loading More Posts
                                            • Oldest to Newest
                                            • Newest to Oldest
                                            • Most Votes
                                            Reply
                                            • Reply as topic
                                            Log in to reply
                                            • First post
                                              Last post